Sunday, March 27, 2011

Yeah, I bet. My suspicion is that Mr. Pacepa simply changed his address

Yeah, I bet. My suspicion is that Mr. Pacepa simply changed his address, not his stripes. If you have any

interesting info about Pacepa’s career in Romania or the United States, please send me links, print citations,

etc., preferably in English (but Romanian is also OK).

So the case against Katherine Gun, whistleblower in the UN spying case, has fizzled out.

But why? “…There is no longer sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction,” prosecutor Mark

Ellison told the judge at the Old Bailey criminal court. “It would not be appropriate for me to go into the

reasons behind that.”

He said it! This is obviously not a matter for jurisprudence (though Ms. Gun was understandably “delighted” to

get off) as much as it is for damage control. The “reasons behind” the fact that there is no “realistic”

chance for prosecution are obvious: it would simply be unrealistic of the British government to supply

“sufficient evidence,” as this would be tantamount to admitting their guilt and they dont want to admit

ANYTHING. Only (very) insufficient evidence can prove a negative case such as this one.

No comments:

Post a Comment